FAYETTEVILLE, Arkansas – A University of Arkansas study has found that using high tunnels in berry production can increase yields, extend the harvest season, and improve fruit quality compared to field production. However, care must be taken to manage pests.
In the Southern Sustainable Agriculture Research & Education (SSARE)-funded project (LS12-250), “Extending the Market Season with High Tunnel Technology for Organic Fruit Production,” researchers explored high tunnel technology to extend the production of summer berries to achieve earlier spring harvest of blueberries and blackberries, and to allow for an extended autumn production of primocane blackberries and raspberries.
“Blueberries and blackberries are traditional southern fruit crops, but harvest and market season is confined to only a few weeks during the summer,” said Curt Rom, a horticulture professor with the University of Arkansas. “Raspberries are not well adapted to hot, humid conditions because the flowers and fruit are not tolerant of high summer temperatures. Even fall-bearing cultivars are limited because they flower during the summer heat.”
Rom and his colleagues wanted to test how well the crops performed in high tunnels and modified high tunnels (tunnel in tunnel systems) compared to open field trials.
In the three-year study, they found that summer floricane blackberries bloomed two to two and a half weeks ahead of open field plants, and reliably had earlier and larger harvests. In some cases high tunnel plants were ready to be harvested two weeks ahead of open field plants and produced nearly three times as much marketable yield.
Although organic blueberry establishment was difficult, once that was achieved, the researchers found that blueberries in the high tunnels out-yielded the field plots by 45 percent.
In the trials to extend the harvest season of autumn primocane blackberries, researchers found that the high tunnel blackberries had an increased yield two to three times that of the open field plots. In addition, harvest was extended anywhere from one to two weeks in the high tunnel. In the tunnel-in-tunnel system, harvest was extended from two to 5 weeks with added freeze protection. As a low-scale technology, tunnel-in-tunnel systems are useful in both increasing high tunnel temperatures during cold periods, and retaining nighttime temperatures.
“The results of the study showed that high tunnels make an ideal complimentary system to field production” said Rom.
Despite the production successes with high tunnels, the researchers faced challenges with pest management, especially in the raspberry high tunnel trials. Insect screens were placed on high tunnels to protect the fruit from spotted wing drosophila, however the screens offered little protection against aphids, two-spotted spider mites and broad mites.
“Primocane production in high tunnels is essentially a new crop with a new set of production and pest issues,” said Rom. “Brambles grown in high tunnels are often threatened by insect pests that thrive under the high tunnel environment and do not affect open field production.”
This observation gave the researchers the opportunity to explore various pest management approaches to control key pests, including organic pesticides, predatory beetles, and traps.
“As a result of these studies a better understanding of bio-pesticide and biological control options for high tunnel has been initiated and needs and opportunities for further research have been identified,” said Rom.
Researchers also developed economic tools to help new and existing berry producers evaluate total production costs and production and marketing risks, determine potential returns, perform economic analyses, and prepare budgets. In addition, growers have access to a Sustainable Blackberry and Raspberry Self-Assessment Workbook to help guide their decision-making to improve overall farm sustainability.
Additional project participants included Elena Garcia, University of Arkansas Cooperative Extension; Donn Johnson, entomologist at University of Arkansas; and Jennie Popp, ag business and economics professor at University of Arkansas.
Published by the Southern Region of the Sustainable Agriculture Research and Education (SARE) program. Funded by the USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture (NIFA), Southern SARE operates under cooperative agreements with the University of Georgia, Fort Valley State University, and the Kerr Center for Sustainable Agriculture to offer competitive grants to advance sustainable agriculture in America's Southern region. This material is based upon work that is supported by the National Institute of Food and Agriculture, U.S. Department of Agriculture, through Southern Sustainable Agriculture Research and Education, under sub-award number: LS12-250. USDA is an equal opportunity employer and service provider. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the view of the U.S. Department of Agriculture.
Want more information? See the related SARE grant: